Building arguments with argumentation: the role of illocutionary force in computational models of argument
نویسندگان
چکیده
Chris REED a 1, Simon WELLS , Katarzyna BUDZYŃSKA b,a and Joseph DEVEREUX a a School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK b Institute of Philosophy, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Poland Abstract. This paper builds upon the proposed dialogical extensions to the AIF, termed AIF+, by making explicit the representation of the role of illocutionary force in the connection between argument structures and dialogical structures. Illocutionary force is realised in the form of Illocutionary Application (YA-) nodes that provide an explicit linkage between the locutions uttered during a dialogue and the underlying arguments expressed by the content of those locutions. This linkage is explored in the context of two contrasting dialogue games from the literature, demonstrating how the approach can support the development of computational models in which the speech-act function of communicative moves can be accounted for.
منابع مشابه
Hybrid Reasoning with Argumentation Schemes
Practical reasoning typically requires a variety of argumentation schemes to be used together to solve problems and make decisions. For example, a legal case may raise issues requiring argument from precedent cases, rules, policy goals, moral principles, jurisprudential doctrine, social values and evidence. We present an extensible software architecture which allows diverse computational models...
متن کاملComputational Modeling of 2-sided Message’s Effects on Perceived Argument Strength
The aim of this research is studying of 2-sided message’s effects on persuasiveness of anti-drug messages by computational modeling method. It’s been done for getting more effective and more persuasive messages. Persuasiveness of messages is measured be perceived argument strength of them which is determined by audiences. In this research, according to formative researches, a method for measuri...
متن کاملComputational Argument as a Diagnostic Tool: The role of reliability
Formal and computational models of argument are ideally suited for education in ill-defined domains such as law, public policy, and science. Open-ended arguments play a central role in these areas but students of the domains may not have been taught an explicit model of argument. Computational models of argument may be ideally suited to act as argument tutors guiding students in the formation o...
متن کاملA Model for Processing Illocutionary Structures and Argumentation in Debates
In this paper, we briefly present the objectives of Inference Anchoring Theory (IAT) and the formal structure which is proposed for dialogues. Then, we introduce our development corpus, and a computational model designed for the identification of discourse minimal units in the context of argumentation and the illocutionary force associated with each unit. We show the categories of resources whi...
متن کاملOn a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion
This paper takes an argumentation approach to find the place of trust in a method for evaluating arguments from expert opinion. The method uses the argumentation scheme for argument from expert opinion along with its matching set of critical questions. It shows how to use this scheme in three formal computational argumentation models that provide tools to analyse and evaluate instances of argum...
متن کامل